NatWest Markets Strategy & Sales

Angela’s Ashes. The Merkel succession and Markets
NWM Rates StrategyImogen Bachra, CFA
19 August 2021 09:46


Authors
Imogen Bachra, CFA
European Rates Strategist
London
+44 20 7085 8381

Contributors
{{contributor-span-repeater}}

If you wish to discuss the content of this article further, please contact your usual sales person. Reminder, clients of Natwest Markets NV should reach out to their relevant NV sales person.

Angela’s Ashes

The Merkel succession and Markets

Germany’s federal elections in September mark the biggest political event in the European calendar in 2021 (in an otherwise politically-calm year). Merkel’s 16-year term will be over, and it is not yet clear who her successor will be. The two front-runners in the polls (Greens and the incumbent CDU/CSU) are losing ground to SPD, which makes the outcome of the elections increasingly uncertain, and a three-way coalition more likely. The composition of the alliance, rather than who takes the Chancellorship, may therefore matter more.

Markets will mostly be focussed on two important questions: i) what does the new government imply for European integration and ii) what does it imply for fiscal policy (both domestically and at the European level)?

For markets the scope for real surprise looks limited. (i) The Greens are likely to enter government as a substantial junior partner in most realistic scenarios; (ii) The AFD lacks momentum and is likely to remain marginal; and (iii) Germany has already shifted on fiscal policy, becoming more fiscally active at home and more accepting of fiscal ‘innovation’ in the Euro Area. Most realistic coalitions will still be pro-EU and pro-fiscal policy, albeit to varying degrees.

Market implications

On fiscal and European policy the key shifts have already taken place. For markets, although the outcome is increasingly uncertain, there are two key takeaways, which remain unchanged. Both tend to confirm the recent shift toward a relatively more pro-European and more agnostic fiscal stance.

i) Greens are likely to be in government, even if Baerbock is not Chancellor. As we outline below, nearly all feasible coalitions include the Greens in some way. The only route to a majority government without the Greens could potentially be a repeat of the incumbent (CDU/CSU-SPD) or a combination of CDU/CSU-SPD-FDP, both of which we attach a low probability to. The Green’s influence on the fiscal policy agenda and on the European project should be taken positively by risk markets in particular.

ii) AfD is very unlikely to be in government. This is the real risk case for markets, given their strong right wing agenda and Eurosceptic rhetoric. AfD currently polls at a stable ~10%, and it is highly unlikely that any other party would form a coalition government that includes AfD.

Markets will look at ‘instinct’ as much as manifestos… that’s probably right. Rather than the election itself, the risk event may be the more drawn-out ‘getting to know’ the new Chancellor and government. That said, markets will assume that coalitions led by the CDU or involving the FDP will focus on returning sooner to the debt brake and greater vigilance on European public finances. That is, these are more bund-positive/periphery-negative outcomes. SPD/Green might be the opposite. A CDU/Green government would be the market-neutral base case, we expect.

We summarise the potential outcomes with associated probabilities we attach to each, plus the likely stance on EU integration and fiscal policy in the table below. Keep reading for more detail on the party policies, and likely coalitions.

Changing of the guard

Whatever the outcome of the Federal Elections (26 Sep), it will mark the end of Angela Merkel’s 16-year Chancellorship in Germany. The potential political shake-up comes at a crucial point in the economic recovery which has been heavily supported by very expansive fiscal policy. The future direction of fiscal policy (amongst other things) could be influenced by the outcome of this election; hence it should be viewed as a somewhat important juncture for European politics (in a year that has otherwise been very quiet on the political front in Europe).

Who is in the running? Meet the candidates and their policies

We expect markets to be most concerned about where candidates (and their parties) lie on their attitudes towards Europe and European integration, and fiscal policy (both domestically and at the European level).

The fiscal divide. Die Linke (the Left), SPD and the Greens are the most fiscally expansive, with ambitious plans for investment and proposing at least some softening of the debt brake. Die Linke is the most extreme in calling for the debt brake to be abolished, the Greens suggest it can be softened/re-designed, whilst SPD will seek to use the “constitutionally possible leeway” for borrowing. SPD leader Scholz has previously stated his ambition to return to the debt brake by 2023, but this was not in the party manifesto. FDP, CDU/CSU and the AfD all call for a return to the debt brake, with FDP and CDU/CSU explicitly stating a preference in their manifestos to return to balanced budgets as soon as possible, and a debt ratio of below 60%.

The divide on Europe. SPD and the Greens emphasise further integration, completing the banking and looking for progress on the fiscal side too. In its manifesto, the Greens explicitly call for a permanent EU-wide investment fund (similar to that of NGEU). FDP and CDU/CSU, although still pro-integration, reject the idea of a debt union – both parties also advocate a swift return to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) rules without reform, with CDU/CSU explicitly referencing the one-off nature of NGEU.

In the table below, we summarise key views of all parties on these issues (from left to right on the political spectrum).


Angela's Charlies: succesors strike their poses to carry on the good fight

Party

Lead candidate

Fiscal policy, taxes

Debt Brake

EU/ Euro

EU fiscal policy

Climate change

Die Linke

Janine Wissler and Dietmar Bartsch

Pro fiscal expansion. Wants to leave policies of austerity behind. Proposing a wealth tax, heavier inheritance tax, high corporate tax

Abolish the debt brake

Pro-integration, with some reforms (e.g. to European taxes)

Debt and deficit rules need to be adjusted - SGP needs to be reformed such that the EU can invest "without a handbrake". In favour of EU bonds

Climate neutral by 2035 at the latest

SPD

Olaf Scholz

Pro fiscal expansion in the near-term: plans to legislate €50bn/year to invest. Wants to make tax system more equal, bring back wealth tax, reform inheritance tax.

Wants to use the "constitutionally possible leeway" for borrowing.

Pro-integration: wants EU to evolve into a fiscal, economic and social union, with completion of the banking union

Believes in fiscal union at EU level: "A crisis-proof EU must be able to act in terms of fiscal policy"

Climate neutral by 2045 at the latest. Increase the reduction target for 2030 significantly (to 65%), which increases to 88% for 2040

Greens

Annalena Baerbock

Pro fiscal expansion: proposing investment of €50bn/year for next decade, and wants to create more tax equality

Re-design debt brake such that necessary investments can be made whilst ensuring sustainability of future interest burden

Pro-integration: believes in a "democratically strengthened" EU that has more capacity to act against today's challenges. Wants to complete banking union with EDIS

Wants to make an EU-wide sustainable investment fund a permanent feature

Raise reduction target for 2030 to 70%, and achieve 100% renewable energy by 2035, so that climate neutrality can be achieved in 20 years

FDP

Christian Lindner

Fiscally conservative: wants Germany's debt ratio to return to below 60% ASAP. Lower income tax rate to below 40%, reduce corporate tax rate to 25%

Return to the debt brake

In favour of reforming EU institutions, against a fiscal and banking union

Rejects a debt union and an EU tax. Wants a return to SGP rules (without reform).

Climate neutrality by 2050

CDU/CSU

Armin Laschet

Fiscally conservative: want balanced budgets again without new debt as quickly as possible
and reduce the debt ratio to below 60%

Return to the debt brake. Rejects any changes to Basic Law to soften it

Pro-integration: advocate a "stability and growth" union

Rejects debt union. NGEU is a one-time borrowing. Fiscal rules of SGP must be restored and violations must be consistently sanctioned

Climate neutrality by 2045

AfD

Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla

Fiscally conservative. Lower tax burden, abolish inheritance tax, implement a national digital tax on tech giants

Return to the debt brake

Believes the euro has failed and there should be a return to national currencies to ensure political sovereignty

There should be no borrowing at the EU level. Believes the NGEU breaks the European Treaties

Rejects decarbonisation measures, any form of CO2 tax to be abolished, rejects the EU's green deal, believes Germany should resign and withdraw support from "climate protection" organisations

Source:  NWM, Party manifestos

Evolving polls currently imply high degree of uncertainty

Polls have shifted considerably in the last few weeks. Greens and CDU/CSU had been clear front-runners (with an alliance of more than 50% looking likely) but are now losing ground to SPD. CDU/CSU still tops the list of voting intentions (having regained its lead over the Greens a few weeks ago), but only at 25%, down from highs of 36% at the beginning of the year. SPD has now overtaken the Greens, polling at 19% vs 18%, as the charts below show.

Polls of voting intentions by party

Source:  NWM, Wikipedia

  

Chancellor polling – Scholz has become clear front runner

Source:   NWM, Wikipedia


  


  

Greens likely to be the kingmaker, despite shifting polls

Germany looks set for another coalition government. But the greens will be hard to exclude on most projections. We expect that a CDU/CSU-SPD ‘grand coalition’ will be very strongly resisted if alternatives are available. If the second or third largest party, as polls suggest, the Greens will likely be the kingmaker. The most likely scenarios are:

Base case. “Black-Green”, CDU/CSU+Greens. This is the currently only realistic two-way governing alliance. Current polls give the Black-Green pairing a total of 44%, still short of an outright majority of 50% (although likely less than 50% of votes would be required for a majority due to smaller parties dropping out due to thresholds to enter parliament).

“Jamaica” Black-Green-Yellow, CDU/CSU+Green+FDP.  If a CDU/CSU- Green alliance needs a third party to get them over the line, the FDP would be the most obvious choice, given CDU/CSU is unlikely to want to govern with the Left, has ruled out an alliance with AfD, and SPD will likely want to position itself in the opposition rather than as junior partner to CDU/CSU again. This “Jamaica” coalition is currently the most popular party combination according to the polls. FDP did pull out of such an alliance during negotiations in 2017, however.

CDU/CSU-Greens (with or without FDP) implies Laschet will be Chancellor, given CDU/CSU would most likely be the senior partner. Even as junior partner, however, having the Greens in government would be positive from both a fiscal policy and European integration perspective, and should be viewed as such by markets.

Tail risks of other scenarios are rising with the SPD’s polling numbers. A government without CDU/CSU is possible. Indeed, the Greens may prefer to pursue such a strategy in order to secure Chancellorship, rather than be junior partner to CDU/CSU.

“Traffic light”, SPD+Green+FDP, is (increasingly) possible from a numbers standpoint – current polls would give them 50% of the vote share (i.e. the third most popular three-way coalition behind Jamaica and CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP, which we think is unlikely). But FDP leader Lindner has already rejected the idea, preferring to differentiate FDP from both parties.

“Kenya”, Black-Red-Green, CDU/CSU + SPD + Greens. After two grand coalitions, we expect that, the SDP will strongly resist a junior role again. The CDU would resist a junior role also, although a Scholz premiership might, just, be possible in this configuration.

A Left alliance is also possible, but likely further apart on policies than Greens and CDU/CSU. Greens, SPD and Die Linke together currently command 45% of the vote share. The compromises required on all sides to come to this agreement, however, may be too much.

Current coalition vote share (NWM probability in brackets)

Source:   NWM, Wikipedia, pollofpolls.eu

  

Potential coalition vote shares over time

Source:   NWM, Wikipedia


  


  

Timeline – negotiations could drag into 2022

German’s will go to the polls on 26 September, between 8am and 6pm (CET).  Exit polls will be published shortly after 6pm. Preliminary results are then likely to be published in the early hours of Monday morning (in 2017 this was done at ~5am).

A new government might not be sworn in until 2022. Current polls imply a higher degree of uncertainty in the election results than previously, with the three biggest parties sharing an almost equal portion of the vote. If this is the case, then negotiations could be lengthy. For context, in 2017, Merkel announced that she would invite the Greens and the FDPs to begin preliminary coalition talks on 18 October, ~ 3 weeks after the election was held. These talks broke down in November, and an alternative agreement between CDU/CSU and SPD was not formally agreed until 7 February – 164 days after polls had closed. In 2013, formal coalition talks began nearly two weeks after polls closed, and a new government was sworn in 86 days after the election. There is no official deadline post-election by which a government must have been formed.

  

  

  

  

  

  


Please click here to find all of NatWest Markets’ Strategy and Sales commentary/ideas. 

You can also find out more about our electronic offering and credentials for Rates here and for FX here.


This is Non-Independent Research, as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority. Not intended for Retail Client distribution. This material should be regarded as a marketing communication and may have been produced in conjunction with the NatWest Markets Plc trading desks that trade as principal in the instruments mentioned herein. All data is accurate as of the report date, unless otherwise specified.

This communication has been prepared by NatWest Markets Plc, and should be regarded as a Marketing Communication, for which the relevant competent authority is the UK Financial Conduct Authority.

Please follow the link for the following information https://ci.natwest.com/regulatory-information/market-abuse-regulation-mar-disclosures:

  • MAR Disclaimer
  • Conflicts of Interest statement
  • Glossary of definitions
  • Historic Trade ideas log

All data is accurate as of the report date, unless otherwise specified.

 

This communication has been prepared by NatWest Markets Plc, NatWest Markets N.V. (and/or any branches) or an affiliated entity (“NatWest Markets”), and should be regarded as a Marketing Communication, for which the relevant competent authority is the UK Financial Conduct Authority (for NatWest Markets Plc) and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (for NatWest Markets N.V.).

 

Please follow the link for the following information https://ci.natwest.com/regulatory-information/market-abuse-regulation-mar-disclosures:

 

MAR Disclaimer

Conflicts of Interest statement

Glossary of definitions

Historic Trade ideas log

 

This material is a Marketing Communication and has not been prepared in accordance with the legal and regulatory requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and may have been produced in conjunction with the NatWest Markets trading desks that trade as principal in the instruments mentioned herein. This commentary is therefore not independent from the proprietary interests of NatWest Markets, which may conflict with your interests. Opinions expressed may differ from the opinions expressed by other business units of NatWest Markets. The remuneration of the author(s) is not directly tied to any transactions performed, or trading fees received, by any entity of the NatWest Group, for example, through the use of commission-based remuneration.

 

This material includes references to securities and related derivatives that the firm's trading desk may make a market or provide liquidity in, and in which it is likely as principal to have a long or short position at any time, including possibly a position that was accumulated on the basis of this analysis material prior to its dissemination. Trading desks may also have or take positions inconsistent with this material. This material may have been made available to other clients of NatWest Markets before it has been made available to you and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of its dissemination. This document has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes. It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this document has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of this material, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update, correct or determine the reasonableness of such material or assumptions contained herein. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not lawfully be disclaimed. The opinions, commentaries, projections, forecasts, assumptions, estimates, derived valuations and target price(s) or other statements contained in this communication (the “Views”) are valid as at the indicated date and/or time and are subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes. Views expressed herein are not intended to be, and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The Views may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this material. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this document and make such other investigations as you deem necessary, including obtaining independent financial advice, before participating in any transaction in respect of the securities referred to in this document. This document is not intended for distribution to, or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. The information contained herein is proprietary to NatWest Markets and is being provided to selected recipients and may not be given (in whole or in part) or otherwise distributed to any other third party without the prior written consent of NatWest Markets.

 

NatWest Markets and its respective affiliates, connected companies, employees or clients may have an interest in financial instruments of the type described in this document and/or in related financial instruments giving rise to potential conflicts of interest which may impact the performance of such financial instruments. Such interests may include, but are not limited to, (a) dealing in, trading, holding or acting as market-maker or liquidity provider in such financial instruments and any reference obligations; (b) entering into hedging strategies on behalf of issuer clients and their affiliates, investor clients or for itself or its affiliates and connected companies; and (c) providing banking, credit and other financial services to any company or issuer of securities or financial instruments referred to herein. NatWest Markets and its affiliates, connected companies, employees or clients may at any time acquire, hold or dispose or long or short positions (including hedging and trading positions) which may impact the performance of a financial instrument.

 

In the U.S., this Marketing Communication is intended for distribution only to major institutional investors as defined in Rule 15a-6 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act 1934 (excluding documents produced by our affiliates within the U.S. which are subject to the following disclaimer https://www.agilemarkets.com/api/ds/v1/disclaimer/publication/2756 ). Any U.S. recipient wanting further information or to effect any transaction related to this trade idea must contact NatWest Markets Securities Inc., 600 Washington Boulevard, Stamford, CT, USA. Telephone: +1 203 897 2700.

 

Where communicated in Singapore, this communication may be deemed an advertisement. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

 

NatWest Markets Plc is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority and is provisionally registered as a swap dealer with the United States Commodity Futures Commission. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised by De Nederlandsche Bank and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. Agency agreements exist between different members of NatWest Group. Securities business in the United States is conducted through NatWest Markets Securities Inc., a FINRA registered broker-dealer ( http://www.finra.org ), a SIPC member ( www.sipc.org ) and a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of NatWest Markets Plc. NatWest Markets Securities Inc. is authorised by NatWest Markets Plc to act as its agent for certain kinds of its activities.

 

For further information relating to materials provided by NatWest Markets, please view our Agile Markets Terms and Conditions

 

Copyright © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.

 

Version 25.06.2021